Group#1
As a group, we had a little trouble in the oral presentation. The wiki page that was created for this presentation was very good illustrated with 3 websites, there are links connecting to everyone of them. We failed to explained clearly to the audience in order to convince them about our material.
Group#2
They presented on Digg, a web site where you could post images . Visual layout was good and clear. They explained in a way where we get the information but to sell a product it wasn’t convincing enough. It’s well written.
Group#3
Very clear and convincing. The page was illustrated by graphics of the actual websites. They did contact with the audience, and answer the questions giving real life examples.
Group#4
Well explained. They give two websites, and they focused in how to improve movie experience in your own computer. Visual layout of this page was well-constructed. Rhetoric was convincing as they show responding to the question given by the audience.
Group#5
This presentation was well illustrated. I little confusing for the content. Images and links of the objects were presented for the audience in a clear manner.
Group#6
This group presented about iphones and explained the some ways to put this gadget to work. There was a website linked to their project, which was very graphic and explenatory for the audience. They presented a video which was a new implemantation to the presentations since no group before presented a video. The group interaction with the audience was a little cold.
Reneriv33's Blog 
Leave a comment